DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005652468-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-16

000107322

Contested design: 005652468-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005652468-0008 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

MAR 2000 OOD

Bulgaria (BG)

JK ‘Nadejda’l, 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

BUREAU IGNATOV & SON

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

LEGO 'Snow Resort Ski Lift' toy set No 41324

Product No 41324 / ASIN B06W2KC5R5 · Amazon.co.uk, supported by LEGO catalogues, lego.com and brickinstructions.com · disclosed 2017-06-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy-set design reproduced LEGO set No 41324 'Snow Resort Ski Lift', disclosed before filing, so it lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, challenged untranslated materials and the reliability of internet evidence, and filed no supporting evidence of its own.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon and corroborating catalogue and website materials as reliable proof that earlier design No 41324 had been made available to the public before filing.
  • Comparing the disclosed features only, the Division found all features of the contested RCD present in the earlier design, held the RCD not novel under Article 5, and declared it invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218