DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005652468-0022

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-16

000107339

Contested design: 005652468-0022

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 005652468-0022 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005652468-0022 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

MAR 2000 OOD

Bulgaria (BG)

JK ‘Nadejda’l, 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

BUREAU IGNATOV & SON

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

toy construction set 'Katana V11 Boat'

LEGO No 70638 · Amazon.fr; LEGO customer and distributor catalogues; John Lewis; Toys R Us · disclosed 2017-12-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested design reproduced LEGO toy set No 70638 'Katana V11 Boat' disclosed before filing.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, challenged the reliability of untranslated and internet-based evidence, and submitted no supporting evidence of its own.
  • The Division found the internet and catalogue evidence reliable in the round and sufficient to prove prior disclosure of design No 70638 before the contested filing date.
  • Comparing the disclosed features, the Division held that all features of the contested RCD were present in the earlier design, so the RCD lacked novelty.
  • The application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear the applicant's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218