DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005652468-0019

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-18

000107319

Contested design: 005652468-0019

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005652468-0019 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

MAR 2000 OOD

Bulgaria (BG)

JK ‘Nadejda’l, 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

BUREAU IGNATOV & SON

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

LEGO Minecraft toy set 'The Chicken Coop' / 'Honssehuset' / 'Le Poulailler'

Product No 21140 / ASIN B075GPHS2G · Amazon.co.uk and corroborating LEGO catalogues / Avenue de la Brique · disclosed 2018-01-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior disclosure of its LEGO Minecraft set No 21140 before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, arguing the untranslated, confidential, and internet-sourced materials were unreliable and insufficient; it filed no supporting evidence.
  • The Division accepted the internet and corroborating catalogue evidence as reliable, found earlier design No 21140 disclosed under Article 7, and rejected the holder's objections.
  • Because all features of the contested RCD were present in the earlier design, the Division found no novelty under Article 5 and invalidated the RCD in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218