DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003476118-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-29

000107946

Contested design: 003476118-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003476118-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

MAR 2000 OOD

Bulgaria (BG)

JK "Nadejda", 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Bureau Ignatov & Son

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Karlof minifigure from the Ninjago theme

https://en.brickipedia.org · Brickipedia · disclosed 2015-01-02

Web disclosure

Lego Ninjago Karlof from kit 70756 with gorilla fists

http://amazon.es · Amazon Spain · disclosed 2015-06-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on earlier online disclosures of the Karlof Ninjago minifigure and alleging the contested toy figure closely copied it.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, reliability, and accessibility of the internet evidence, argued the materials were insufficient or untranslated, and maintained the contested design satisfied novelty and individual character.
  • The Invalidity Division admitted the applicant's additional Brickipedia evidence, rejected manipulation allegations as unsubstantiated, and found the Brickipedia and Amazon materials proved public disclosure before the filing date.
  • Given broad designer freedom for stylised toy figures, the Division found the shared armour, helmet, fists, proportions, and colour scheme outweighed minor facial and decoration differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218