DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006371787-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-02

000107320

Contested design: 006371787-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0063717870001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

MAR 2000 OOD

Bulgaria (BG)

JK 'Nadejda', 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Bureau Ignatov & Son

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Packaging/box depiction of the LEGO Juniors Jurassic World Pteranodon Escape toy construction set scene.

LEGO Juniors Jurassic World Pteranodon Escape Set No 10756 · Amazon.es, Amazon.co.uk, Bricksbuyer, Brickinstructions, Brickowl, Brickipedia, and LEGO catalogues · disclosed 2018-04-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7(1)Article 5(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested design reproduced the LEGO Jurassic World Juniors Pteranodon Escape set packaging scene disclosed before filing.
  • Holder disputed reliable disclosure and translation of the evidence, and argued the contested design differed because it was a construction set rather than packaging.
  • The Division found the combined internet and catalogue evidence proved disclosure before 8 April 2019 and rejected unsupported manipulation objections.
  • The Division held the contested design was identical to the earlier disclosed scene, lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b), and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218