Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-02
000107323
Contested design: 006371787-0017
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text
The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0063717870017 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction
Denmark (DK)
Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
MAR 2000 OOD
Bulgaria (BG)
JK 'Nadejda', 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
Packaging scene with a black carriage drawn by a Pegasus and two minifigures from LEGO set No 75951.
LEGO Grindelwald's Escape Set No 75951 packaging · Amazon.es, Amazon.com.au, Bricklink, Brickinstructions, Brickowl and Brickipedia · disclosed 2018-07-02
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued the contested design copied the packaging scene of LEGO Grindelwald's Escape Set No 75951, disclosed in 2018 through catalogues, Amazon pages and specialist toy websites.
- ›The holder challenged the reliability, translation and accessibility of the internet evidence and said the contested construction-set design differed from the earlier toy-box layout.
- ›The Division accepted the web and catalogue evidence as sufficient disclosure before filing and rejected the holder's manipulation and market-access objections as unsupported.
- ›The Division found the designs identical except for immaterial wheel-size and viewing-angle differences, so the contested RCD lacked novelty and was declared invalid.
- ›Because the application succeeded in full on novelty, the Division did not examine the separate lack-of-individual-character ground and ordered the holder to bear costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131885 vs Zhenkai Cui | 2026-04-30 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000129622 vs Squar3D Aps | 2026-04-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000129681 vs Squar3D Aps | 2026-04-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000126976 vs Dohány Kft. | 2026-04-08 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000131547 vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000131507 vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-31 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000130128 vs joboo GmbH | 2026-02-03 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000130086 vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED | 2026-02-02 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |