DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006581245-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-07

000110182

Contested design: 006581245-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 65812450009 è dichiarato nullo. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dal richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dado Ceramica s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sicilia, 21, San Giovanni in Prisceto (BO) Italia

Represented by

Stefano Querzè

Holder · RCD owner

Italcer S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Emilia Ovest, 53/A, 42048 Rubiera (RE) Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.A.

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAllegato A1

Rock Mosaico Carbone 5x5 tile / mosaic tile with code DA2197/105

Antica Ceramica Rubiera 24 catalogo prodotti, p. 128 · Antica Ceramica Rubiera product catalog · disclosed 2012-10-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity of the contested tile design for lack of novelty and individual character over the earlier Rock Mosaico Carbone 5x5 tile, and also invoked technical function.
  • The holder filed no observations or evidence in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted prior disclosure under Article 7(1) based on the dated 2012 catalog and supporting price list, with no rebuttal to public availability before filing.
  • It found the shared square format, six-by-six checkerboard arrangement and overall appearance dominated minor colour and shape differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid in full, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258