DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005843299-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-14

000108701

Contested design: 005843299-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005843299-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

VitaSalts AGvia PDF extraction

LI

Landstr. 14, 9496 Balzers, Lichtenstein

Holder · RCD owner

Tuanfang Liu

China (CN)

No. 2, Xia'an, Zhongzhou Village, Zhouhu Town, Anfu County, Ji'an City, Jiangxi Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Matthias Scholl, Inc.

Danuta Hryszkiewicz

Prior art cited (1)

International design

electronic cigarette

International design No DM/097 448 · WIPO design database / International Designs Bulletin No. 35/2017 · disclosed 2017-07-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier international design for an electronic cigarette published by WIPO in 2017.
  • The holder filed no response to the invalidity application and submitted no observations on disclosure, designer freedom, or overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the WIPO extract as sufficient proof of prior disclosure under Article 7 and found average designer freedom for electronic-cigarette shape.
  • Because the prior and contested designs shared the same overall shape and arrangement of elements, the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

27.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130847

vs Ying CAO

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000125137

vs Shenzhen Olit Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000127919

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2025-05-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000124395

vs Xin Lu

2025-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126756

vs SHENZHEN KAIWEILI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2024-12-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126655

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126656

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126597

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278