DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005280021-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-15

000109082

Contested design: 005280021-0009

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. Se declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 005280021 -0009. La titular sufrague las costas de la solicitante, cuantificadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pentra GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Gartenweg 22, 35447 Reiskirchen, Alemania

Holder · RCD owner

Keekoo INCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

1121 13th St s. Londres 187, Boulder, Colorado 80302, Estados Unidos de América

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

ball for use as a toy

RCD No 004097988 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-07-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested toy ball lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier registered Community design.
  • Applicant relied on RCD No 004097988, published on 2017-07-14, and argued the color differences merely showed another stage of the same puzzle toy.
  • Holder filed no response, so the case proceeded undefended while the Division accepted publication of the earlier RCD as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • The Division found the designs produced the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor color differences, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN Bavel
  • MemberLudmila ELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberALVARO Sesma MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218