Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-23
000106519
Contested design: 002876102-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 002876102-0001 is declared invalid.
Show verbatim operative text
The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002876102-0001 is declared invalid.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Neoz Pty Ltdvia PDF extraction
AU
20 Tepko Road, Terrey Hills, New South Wales 2084, Australia
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Imagilights BVBAvia PDF extraction
Belgium (BE)
Nijverheidslaan 62C, 8540 Deerlijk, Belgium
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
lamps
RCD No 002215095-0002 · Office Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-05-06
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier disclosed RCD No 002215095-0002 for lamps.
- ›Holder argued the application was inadmissible or unsubstantiated because the earlier design had been invalidated and allegedly was not properly identified or proven disclosed.
- ›The Division held Article 25(1)(b) was clearly pleaded, the earlier RCD was sufficiently identified, and its prior bulletin publication remained valid prior art despite later invalidation.
- ›Comparing the lamps from the informed user's perspective, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.
- ›The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000130945 vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS | 2026-05-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000131284 vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | 2026-04-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000131264 vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | 2026-04-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000131304 vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | 2026-04-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000131245 vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | 2026-04-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000131366 vs DANMAR TECH SL | 2026-04-08 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000131247 vs chao zhai | 2026-04-02 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |
| 000129540 vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-24 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 26 | 8 |