DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002876102-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-23

000106521

Contested design: 002876102-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid; the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002876102-0003 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Neoz Pty Ltdvia PDF extraction

AU

20 Tepko Road, Terrey Hills, New South Wales 2084, Australia

Holder · RCD owner

Imagilights BVBAvia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Nijverheidslaan 62C, 8540 Deerlijk, Belgium

Represented by

K.O.B. N.V.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

lamps

RCD No 002215095-0001 · Office Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-05-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier disclosed RCD No 002215095-0001.
  • The holder argued the application was inadmissible or unsubstantiated because the cited design had been invalidated and allegedly was not properly identified or proved disclosed.
  • The Division held the Article 25(1)(b) ground was clearly raised, the earlier RCD was sufficiently identified, and its prior publication remained valid prior art despite later invalidation.
  • Comparing the table-lamp designs, the Division found only minor differences and concluded the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user, so it lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268