DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004001709-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-23

000107499

Contested design: 004001709-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0040017090001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Darren Hornbyvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

9 Mountbatten Gardens, Beckenham Kent BR3 3TJ, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Li Hao Trading Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm 2513, No. 26, Yuenan Street, Huangsha Avenue, Liwan District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Prior art cited (1)

National design

Wrinkle paper lantern

Chinese design registration No 201230228317.2 · DesignView database · disclosed 2012-12-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing that the same paper-lantern design had long been sold by many providers before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder denied any lack of novelty or individual character and argued that the prior designs did not disclose the contested lantern's detailed internal structure or the same overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Chinese design registration from the DesignView extract and treated it as sufficient prior art under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing the designs from the informed user's perspective, the Division found shared core features and only minor differences that did not change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested RCD lacked individual character over the prior design; novelty was not examined further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268