DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006581245-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-08-12

000109861

Contested design: 006581245-0004

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of RCD No 6581245-0004 is rejected, and the applicants must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 6581245-0004 è respinta. 2. I richiedenti sopportano l’onere delle spese sostenute dal titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dado Ceramica s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sicilia, 21, San Giovanni in Prisceto (BO) Italia

Represented by

Stefano Querzè

Holder · RCD owner

Italcer S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Emilia Ovest, 53/A, 42048 Rubiera (RE) Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.A.

Prior art cited (4)

CatalogD1⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres "Ferrara" tile model

Star Gres catalog / invoice / web links · disclosed 2006-11-30

CatalogD2⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres "Savona" tile model

Star Gres catalog / invoice / file-property screenshot / web links · disclosed 2006-11-30

CatalogD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres "Villa Toscana" tile model

Star Gres catalog

National designD4

tile

UK design No 1051901 · DesignView / UK design publication · disclosed 1988-06-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on the earlier Star Gres Ferrara tile and a UK tile design.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the evidence for D1 to D3 insufficient to prove prior disclosure, but accepted publication of UK design No 1051901 as prior art.
  • Comparing the contested tile with D4, the Division held that the mosaic square tesserae and grout lines create a different overall impression, so the contested design has individual character.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicants were ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128596

vs Griptel AB

2025-07-17Art 25(1)(b)257
000124436

vs Ziel Home Furnishing Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-11-19Art 25(1)(b)257
000121100

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121138

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121099

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000120379

vs Ergosafe Aktiebolag

2023-10-26Art 25(1)(b)257
000120958

vs Yimei Zhu

2023-07-27Art 25(1)(b)257
000119859

vs BoZarc

2023-06-02Art 25(1)(b)257