DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006581245-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-08-12

000110322

Contested design: 006581245-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicants must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n 6581245-0002 è respinta. 2. I richiedenti sopportano l’onere delle spese sostenute dal titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dado Ceramica s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sicilia, 21, San Giovanni in Prisceto (BO) Italia

Represented by

Stefano Querzè

Holder · RCD owner

Italcer S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Emilia Ovest, 53/A, 42048 Rubiera (RE) Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.A.

Prior art cited (4)

Prior useD1⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres 'Ferrara' tile

Star Gres catalog / invoice / alleged web disclosure · disclosed 2006-11-30

Prior useD2⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres 'Savona' tile

Star Gres catalog / invoice / alleged web disclosure · disclosed 2006-11-30

CatalogD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres 'Villa Toscana' tile

Star Gres catalog

National designD4

A tile

UK design No. 1051901 · DesignView / UK design register · disclosed 1988-06-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Star Gres tile models Ferrara, Savona and Villa Toscana, plus UK design No. 1051901.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the catalog, invoice, price list, links and file-property screenshot insufficient to prove disclosure of D1 to D3 under Article 7.
  • The Division accepted publication of UK design No. 1051901 as prior disclosure, but held the contested tile created a different overall impression and retained individual character.
  • The invalidity application was therefore rejected and the applicants were ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128596

vs Griptel AB

2025-07-17Art 25(1)(b)257
000124436

vs Ziel Home Furnishing Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-11-19Art 25(1)(b)257
000121100

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121138

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121099

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000120379

vs Ergosafe Aktiebolag

2023-10-26Art 25(1)(b)257
000120958

vs Yimei Zhu

2023-07-27Art 25(1)(b)257
000119859

vs BoZarc

2023-06-02Art 25(1)(b)257