DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006581245-0017

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-08-12

000110327

Contested design: 006581245-0017

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against registered Community design No 6581245-0017 is rejected, and the applicants must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n 6581245-0017 è respinta. 2. I richiedenti sopportano l’onere delle spese sostenute dal titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dado Ceramica s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sicilia, 21, San Giovanni in Prisceto (BO) Italia

Represented by

Stefano Querzè

Holder · RCD owner

Italcer S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Emilia Ovest, 53/A, 42048 Rubiera (RE) Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.A.

Prior art cited (4)

Prior useD1⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres tile model "Ferrara"

Star Gres catalog, invoice, and alleged web disclosure · disclosed 2006-11-30

Prior useD2⚠ rejected as evidence

Star Gres tile model "Savona"

Star Gres catalog, invoice, and alleged web disclosure · disclosed 2006-11-30

Prior useD3⚠ rejected as evidence

tile model "Villa Toscana"

Star Gres catalog

National designD4

tile

United Kingdom design No 1051901 · DesignView / United Kingdom design register · disclosed 1988-06-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Star Gres tile models Ferrara, Savona and Villa Toscana, plus UK design No 1051901.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the evidence for D1 to D3 insufficient to prove prior disclosure, because the catalog was undated and the invoice, price list, links and screenshots did not reliably show the designs' appearance.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of UK design No 1051901 but held that the contested tile created a different overall impression because of its mosaic square tesserae and grout lines; the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128596

vs Griptel AB

2025-07-17Art 25(1)(b)257
000124436

vs Ziel Home Furnishing Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-11-19Art 25(1)(b)257
000121100

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121138

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121099

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000120379

vs Ergosafe Aktiebolag

2023-10-26Art 25(1)(b)257
000120958

vs Yimei Zhu

2023-07-27Art 25(1)(b)257
000119859

vs BoZarc

2023-06-02Art 25(1)(b)257