DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003447291-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-28

000105082

Contested design: 003447291-0005

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0034472910005 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Henkell Freixenet Polska Spółka z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Mazowiecka 48, 87100 Toruń, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Ami Honey Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Brazylijska 16B/2, 03946 Warszawa, Poland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 25(1)(f)Article 10(2)(a)Article 10(2)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) and (f) CDR based on earlier Polish and EU trade marks and alleged Polish copyright in Nalewka Babuni label designs.
  • Holder argued the relied-on signs were not earlier or enforceable, relevant marks were unused or dissimilar, and the alleged copyright transfers and similarities were unproven.
  • The Division found no likelihood of confusion with the only valid earlier Polish mark because similarities were limited to weak or secondary label elements and the signs were aurally and conceptually dissimilar.
  • It also found the applicant failed to prove or enforce most alleged copyrights and that the substantiated cherry label copyright was not reproduced in the contested design; the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000105059

vs Ami Honey Sp. z o. o.

2020-09-28Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)199
000105079

vs Ami Honey Sp. z o. o.

2020-09-28Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)199
000113301

vs РАМИСОВ 70

2021-07-16Art 25(1)(e)197
000113281

vs РАМИСОВ 70

2021-07-16Art 25(1)(e)197
000105081

vs Ami Honey Sp. z o. o.

2020-09-28Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)197
000105080

vs Ami Honey Sp. z o. o.

2020-09-28Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)197
000119359

vs TECH LIVING LIMITED

2023-06-12Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)6
000104359

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2020-06-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)6