DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008500755-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-12

000119359

Contested design: 008500755-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holders' costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008500755-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holders’ costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Innersloth LLCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

P.O. Box 2532, Redmond, Washington 98073, United States

Represented by

Brandit IPR ApS

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaochuan Kevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

267 Jayde Overpass, Sault, France

Prior art cited (4)

Trade mark

figurative mark depicting a crewmate-like character

EUTM No 018384100 · EU trade mark register · disclosed 2020-12-09

Trade mark

figurative mark 'AMONG US' with a crewmate-like character replacing the letter A

EUTM No 018384099 · EU trade mark register · disclosed 2020-12-09

Other⚠ rejected as evidence

Among Us Crewmate

Copyright registration No VA0002248503 · U.S. Copyright Office / Library of Congress · disclosed 2020-04-20

Publication⚠ rejected as evidence

undated and unreferenced image of the claimed earlier Crewmate illustration

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 25(1)(e)Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • Applicant alleged lack of novelty and individual character, trade mark conflict, and unauthorised copyright use based on its earlier Crewmate-related rights.
  • Holders filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier EUTM records but found a different overall impression, no likelihood of confusion, and no substantiated copyright law basis.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear the holders' costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130723

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000130722

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000130721

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000130683

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000130701

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000130684

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000104359

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2020-06-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)8
000010730

vs BEVERAGES Mark Limited

2018-06-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)8