DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015095621-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-23

000130723

Contested design: 015095621-0006

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015095621-0006 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

geobra Brandstätter Stiftung & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Zirndorf, Germany

Represented by

Sebastian Eckhardt

Holder · RCD owner

Shengzhi Jiang

China (CN)

Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Emilio Zeininger

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

hockey player toy figure

EU design No 002597815-0017 · EUIPO eSearch database · disclosed 2015-10-05

Registered RCDD2

hockey player toy figure

EU design No 002597815-0012 · EUIPO eSearch database · disclosed 2015-10-05

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Power Planet toy figure shown on online retail pages and search results

Made-in-China website / Google search results · disclosed 2023-11-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 25(1)(e)Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier EU designs D1 and D2 and alleged additional internet disclosures of Power Planet toys.
  • Applicant also relied on earlier PLAYMOBIL trade marks and German copyright; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and D2 but found the contested construction-worker figure produced a different overall impression from the earlier hockey-player designs.
  • It found no likelihood of confusion with the earlier marks and held the copyright claim insufficiently substantiated and the protected work insufficiently identified.
  • The application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130722

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130721

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130701

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130684

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130683

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000119359

vs TECH LIVING LIMITED

2023-06-12Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000130341

vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)217
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)217