DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 007537964-0013

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-30

000130844

Contested design: 007537964-0013

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of EU design No 007537964-0013 is rejected; the applicant bears the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 007537964-0013 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KGW UG (haftungsbeschränkt)via PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Weitersburg, Germany

Represented by

Von Bülow & Tamada

Holder · RCD owner

Lego A/S

Denmark (DK)

Billund, Denmark

Prior art cited (4)

CatalogAnnex 1

LEGO building block part No. 6123809 from set No. 60214-1 (Burger Bar Fire Rescue)

LEGO set No. 60214 building instructions (pages 1, 45-48), block No. 6123809 · LEGO set No. 60214 building instructions

Web disclosureAnnex 2

LEGO building block part No. 6123809 shown in YouTube video of set 60214

https://www.youtube.com, video of LEGO set 60214, part 6123809 · YouTube (www.youtube.com) · disclosed 2019-01-03

Web disclosureAnnex 3

LEGO building block part No. 6123809 from BrickLink search results

www.bricklink.com, search results for part No. 6123809 · BrickLink (www.bricklink.com)

Web disclosureAnnex 4

LEGO building block part No. 6123809 from LEGO Pick a Brick website

https://www.lego.com/de-de/pick-and-build/pick-a-brick?query=6123809, LEGO part 6123809 from set 22885 · LEGO.com Pick a Brick (www.lego.com)

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 8(3)Article 10

Argument summary

  • Applicant (KGW UG) challenged LEGO building block design for lack of individual character over earlier LEGO block part 6123809 (from set 60214, disclosed on YouTube on 03/01/2019); argued both designs share identical compact cuboid shape, 2×2 upper stud arrangement, and plain surfaces, with the only difference being two side-wall studs per side on the contested design — a minor repetition insufficient to change the overall impression.
  • Holder argued the side-wall hollow studs (8 total in contested design vs 4 in prior art) are prominent and visually transformative, making the contested design appear bulkier and more cubic; also submitted that the prior art lacked an underside view, leaving further differences unexcluded.
  • Division found designer freedom not severely restricted by interoperability requirements; under Article 8(3) EUDR (modular systems), interconnection features including side-wall studs must be taken into account for the overall impression; the informed user of construction toy bricks will notice features affecting interconnection possibilities during normal use.
  • Side-wall hollow studs (number, arrangement, hollow vs solid), resulting different silhouette (slimmer vs bulkier/more cubic), and potentially different underside features combine to produce a different overall impression; contested design has individual character; application rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000072551

vs Lv Cheng Liang

2026-06-26Art 25(1)(b)217
000129541

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129510

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129524

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129509

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129525

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000129511

vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L.

2026-06-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000130341

vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)217