Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-30
000130844
Contested design: 007537964-0013
Outcome
The application for a declaration of invalidity of EU design No 007537964-0013 is rejected; the applicant bears the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 007537964-0013 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
KGW UG (haftungsbeschränkt)via PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Weitersburg, Germany
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Lego A/S
Denmark (DK)
Billund, Denmark
Represented by
Prior art cited (4)
LEGO building block part No. 6123809 from set No. 60214-1 (Burger Bar Fire Rescue)
LEGO set No. 60214 building instructions (pages 1, 45-48), block No. 6123809 · LEGO set No. 60214 building instructions
LEGO building block part No. 6123809 shown in YouTube video of set 60214
https://www.youtube.com, video of LEGO set 60214, part 6123809 · YouTube (www.youtube.com) · disclosed 2019-01-03
LEGO building block part No. 6123809 from BrickLink search results
www.bricklink.com, search results for part No. 6123809 · BrickLink (www.bricklink.com)
LEGO building block part No. 6123809 from LEGO Pick a Brick website
https://www.lego.com/de-de/pick-and-build/pick-a-brick?query=6123809, LEGO part 6123809 from set 22885 · LEGO.com Pick a Brick (www.lego.com)
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›Applicant (KGW UG) challenged LEGO building block design for lack of individual character over earlier LEGO block part 6123809 (from set 60214, disclosed on YouTube on 03/01/2019); argued both designs share identical compact cuboid shape, 2×2 upper stud arrangement, and plain surfaces, with the only difference being two side-wall studs per side on the contested design — a minor repetition insufficient to change the overall impression.
- ›Holder argued the side-wall hollow studs (8 total in contested design vs 4 in prior art) are prominent and visually transformative, making the contested design appear bulkier and more cubic; also submitted that the prior art lacked an underside view, leaving further differences unexcluded.
- ›Division found designer freedom not severely restricted by interoperability requirements; under Article 8(3) EUDR (modular systems), interconnection features including side-wall studs must be taken into account for the overall impression; the informed user of construction toy bricks will notice features affecting interconnection possibilities during normal use.
- ›Side-wall hollow studs (number, arrangement, hollow vs solid), resulting different silhouette (slimmer vs bulkier/more cubic), and potentially different underside features combine to produce a different overall impression; contested design has individual character; application rejected.
Deciding panel
- MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
- MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
- MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000072551 vs Lv Cheng Liang | 2026-06-26 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000129541 vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L. | 2026-06-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000129510 vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L. | 2026-06-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000129524 vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L. | 2026-06-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000129509 vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L. | 2026-06-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000129525 vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L. | 2026-06-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000129511 vs ITALTRIKE S.R.L. | 2026-06-23 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000130341 vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS | 2026-05-27 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |