DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015041255-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-27

000130341

Contested design: 015041255-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015041255-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Robitsvia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Kortrijk, Belgium

Represented by

De Clercq & Partners

Holder · RCD owner

Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

Denmark (DK)

Hadsten, Denmark

Represented by

Niels Uth

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 8(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that all visible features of the slope brick were dictated solely by technical function and interconnection, so the design was invalid under Article 25(1)(b) with Article 8(1) and 8(2).
  • The holder replied that the incline, angle, and overall look reflected design freedom and that the brick formed part of a modular construction system protected by Article 8(3).
  • The Division found the design's features were function-driven and also fell within interconnection features, but examined the modular-system exception because the holder relied on Article 8(3).
  • The Division held the contested brick serves multiple assembly within a modular system and benefits from Article 8(3); the invalidity application was therefore rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)217
000129624

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000129621

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000129661

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000130709

vs Shantou Chenghai district Shuangjia plastic toy factory

2026-02-26Art 25(1)(b)217
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24Art 25(1)(b)217
000130683

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)217
000130684

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)217