DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015095621-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-23

000130683

Contested design: 015095621-0003

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015095621-0003 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

geobra Brandstätter Stiftung & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Zirndorf, Germany

Represented by

Sebastian Eckhardt

Holder · RCD owner

Shengzhi Jiang

China (CN)

Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Emilio Zeininger

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

Toy figure resembling a hockey player.

EU design No 002597815-0017 · Office eSearch / publication · disclosed 2015-10-05

Registered RCDD2

Toy figure resembling a hockey player.

EU design No 002597815-0012 · Office eSearch / publication · disclosed 2015-10-05

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Toy figure used in Power Planet toy sets.

Power Planet / Made-in-China / Google search results · Internet materials cited by the applicant · disclosed 2023-11-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 25(1)(e)Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the police toy figure copied its earlier PLAYMOBIL designs, used its trade mark features and infringed German copyright, and it also relied on alleged Power Planet internet disclosures.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure only of earlier designs D1 and D2, rejected the internet materials as insufficient proof of disclosure, and found the contested figure produced a different overall impression and remained new.
  • The trade mark claim failed because any similarity was low and outweighed by the contested figure's distinct police outfit and features, while the copyright claim failed because the protected work and German-law basis were not properly substantiated.
  • All invalidity grounds were rejected, and the applicant had to bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130722

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130721

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130723

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130701

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000130684

vs Shengzhi Jiang

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)2111
000119359

vs TECH LIVING LIMITED

2023-06-12Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f), Art 25(1)(e)219
000130341

vs Mortensen Software Consulting ApS

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b)217
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)217