DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006649075-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-28

000109941

Contested design: 006649075-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 006649075-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sorin Sirbuvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Sfintii Apostoli nr 137, 200501, Craiova Romania

Represented by

Cabinet Doina Țuluca

Doina Țuluca

Holder · RCD owner

Wang Yunweivia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Xiahe,Tongshan Village, Dalonghua Town,Fengshun County, Guangdong Province 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Jessie Leung

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

scooter

RCD No 002687988-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-04-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 002687988-0001 and also invoked conflict with that earlier design right under Article 25(1)(d).
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD but found the compared scooter designs differed in several visible features, producing a different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The Article 25(1)(d) ground also failed because the invoked prior design had been made available before, not after, the contested RCD filing date; the application was therefore rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
0001099222020-09-23Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)129
000126216

vs Yiwu Guanze Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-10-21Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)127
000117792

vs GUANGZHOU XIANGTAI VEHICLE INDUSTRY CO,LTD

2022-10-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)127
000117735

vs GUANGZHOU XIANGTAI VEHICLE INDUSTRY CO,LTD

2022-10-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)127
000117793

vs GUANGZHOU XIANGTAI VEHICLE INDUSTRY CO,LTD

2022-10-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)127
000110065

vs iAQUA (Shenzhen) Limited

2021-05-17Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)127
000110066

vs iAQUA (Shenzhen) Limited

2021-05-17Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)127
000106480

vs Scooterson Inc.

2020-07-16Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)127