DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015048833-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-21

000126216

Contested design: 015048833-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 015048833-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guilin Dashen Plastics Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 18, Lushan Road, Lingui Town, Lingui District, Guilin, Guangxi 541100 China

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

Yiwu Guanze Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 205, Unit 3, Building 40, Pingchou 2nd District, Jiangdong Street, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, China

Represented by

Maria Ioannides

Prior art cited (5)

Registered RCDprior design 1

prior registered wheel-cover design

Community design No 015035472-0007 · EUIPO registration publication · disclosed 2023-10-02

Web disclosureprior design 2⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon extract showing an unregistered wheel-cover design

Amazon · disclosed 2023-12-28

Web disclosureprior design 3⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon extract showing an unregistered wheel-cover design

Amazon · disclosed 2024-01-07

Web disclosureprior design 4⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon extract showing an unregistered wheel-cover design

Amazon · disclosed 2023-12-26

Web disclosureprior design 5⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon extract showing an unregistered wheel-cover design

Amazon · disclosed 2023-12-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant relied on Article 25(1)(d) CDR based on its earlier RCD No 015035472-0007 and also alleged lack of novelty and individual character over four Amazon-disclosed designs.
  • The applicant argued the designs shared the same cylindrical shape, branch-like tread pattern, prominent grooves, uniform groove dimensions, edge detailing, and functional purpose.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found Article 25(1)(d) CDR inapplicable because the earlier RCD had already been published before the contested design's filing date, and the Amazon evidence did not prove reliable disclosure dates or URLs for the alleged prior designs.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122874

vs Great Wall Motor Company Limited

2026-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000129519

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000129537

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000124339

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120399

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120438

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120874

vs José RODRIGUES DA COSTA

2023-12-07Art 25(1)(b)127