DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015072930-0031

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-11

000129537

Contested design: 015072930-0031

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 015072930-0031 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Spark Technologies, SIAvia PDF extraction

LV

Rīga, Lettland

Represented by

Kristine Viļķina

Holder · RCD owner

AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

Germany (DE)

Potsdam, Deutschland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

boat rubbing-strake design shown in the video 'Aspen Carbon Cat Tour & Running Video'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyWngk9BPps&t=217s · youtube.com · disclosed 2022-10-07

Web disclosureD2⚠ rejected as evidence

boat design shown in a screenshot of a post by account 'Oto Dzenis'

Facebook (claimed) · disclosed 2024-08-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on two earlier online disclosures said to show the same boat-side rubbing-strake design.
  • The holder contested both grounds and argued that the contested design created a different overall impression, with relevant differences in segment count, line inclination, width and shape.
  • The Division accepted D1 as a prior internet disclosure from YouTube but rejected D2 because the screenshot did not reliably establish its source or disclosure circumstances.
  • Comparing only the protected features shown in the registered view, the Division found clear differences in form, proportions and interruptions, so the contested design had individual character and remained new.
  • The invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) were not proven, the application was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvan PRANDZHEV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122874

vs Great Wall Motor Company Limited

2026-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000129519

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000124339

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000126216

vs Yiwu Guanze Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-10-21Art 25(1)(b)127
000120438

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120399

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120874

vs José RODRIGUES DA COSTA

2023-12-07Art 25(1)(b)127