DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008837884-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-29

000124339

Contested design: 008837884-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant is ordered to bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008837884-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KCT GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Robert-Bosch-Str. 30, 72348 Rosenfeld, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Radosław Pryba

Poland (PL)

Kolejowa 15, 67-300 Szprotawa, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Unregistered CD

KCT insect screen and ISR roller blind for vehicle windows

http:/www.kctechnik.com/em/blinds.html · WayBackMachine Internet Archive; applicant's Product Catalogue 2013 · disclosed 2013-03-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant alleged lack of novelty and individual character, relying on its earlier insect screen and roller blind disclosed online, in its 2013 catalogue, and other supporting materials.
  • The holder argued the invoked prior design was visually and functionally different, that similarities concerned technical features, and that the contested design should remain registered.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the applicant's earlier blind design from the archived webpage and catalogue, but disregarded other materials that did not clearly identify or date the invoked design.
  • Comparing the accepted prior design with the registered design, the Division found the added vehicle window and other visible differences created a different overall impression and defeated both Article 6 and Article 5 attacks.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122874

vs Great Wall Motor Company Limited

2026-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000129519

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000129537

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000126216

vs Yiwu Guanze Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-10-21Art 25(1)(b)127
000120399

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120438

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120874

vs José RODRIGUES DA COSTA

2023-12-07Art 25(1)(b)127