DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002510883-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-29

000120438

Contested design: 002510883-0006

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 002510883-0006 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Suzhou Anri Child Products Co.,Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Building 1, Southern Zhitang Industrial Park, Changshu, Jiangsu, 215500, China

Represented by

Bird & Bird LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Cybex GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Riedingerstr. 18, 95448 Bayreuth, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

National designAnlage 2

Kinderwagen

CN201230004277.3 · Chinese Patent Office · disclosed 2012-07-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested stroller design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese design CN201230004277.3 published in 2012.
  • Holder argued the Chinese design was not properly proven or accessible to relevant EU circles and, in any event, the compared designs created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the Chinese design had been validly disclosed by the official extract showing publication on 18 July 2012, despite limited translation.
  • It held designer freedom remained broad and that the frame structure, joints, wheels, and basket details produced a different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The invalidity application was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.12

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122874

vs Great Wall Motor Company Limited

2026-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000129537

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000129519

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000124339

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000126216

vs Yiwu Guanze Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-10-21Art 25(1)(b)127
000120399

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120874

vs José RODRIGUES DA COSTA

2023-12-07Art 25(1)(b)127