DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008837884-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-29

000124336

Contested design: 008837884-0004

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008837884-0004 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KCT GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Robert-Bosch-Str. 30, 72348 Rosenfeld, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Radosław Pryba

Poland (PL)

Kolejowa 15, 67-300 Szprotawa, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

ISR sun visor / roller blind handrail profile

http:/www.kctechnik.com/em/blinds.html · WayBackMachine Internet Archive and applicant Product Catalogue 2013 · disclosed 2013-03-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on its earlier ISR handrail design shown on its website, in its 2013 catalogue, invoices, drawings and comparison photos.
  • Holder denied sufficient proof of public disclosure, disputed that the cited invoices identified the same design, and argued the visible handle features, proportions and surface finish materially differed.
  • The Division accepted that the website and 2013 catalogue disclosed a prior handrail before filing, but not the cross-section or other internal features shown only in non-public drawings and unclear photos.
  • Because the prior design evidence did not permit a sufficiently clear full comparison, the Division found neither the same overall impression nor identity had been proven.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, the hearing request was refused, and the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122874

vs Great Wall Motor Company Limited

2026-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000129519

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000129537

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000124339

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000126216

vs Yiwu Guanze Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-10-21Art 25(1)(b)127
000120399

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120438

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120874

vs José RODRIGUES DA COSTA

2023-12-07Art 25(1)(b)127