DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003491869-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-12-07

000120874

Contested design: 003491869-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l’encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 003491869-0001 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais du titulaire fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Neomark s.à.r.l.via PDF extraction

LU

14a, Rue de la Gare, 4924 Hautcharage, Luxembourg

Holder · RCD owner

José Rodrigues da Costavia PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua José Manuel Carilho 6, Buarcos, 3080-232 Figueira da Foz, Portugal

Represented by

Cabinet Camus Lebkiri

Stéphanie Rito

Prior art cited (1)

PatentAnnexe 2

dispositif de levage

EP 3 450 381 · European patent application · disclosed 2019-02-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that all visible features of the contested lifting device were dictated solely by technical function under Article 8(1), relying mainly on patent application EP 3 450 381.
  • The holder replied that the applicant had not proved every feature was purely functional, pointing to the colour choices and rounded conical side walls as non-technical design choices.
  • The Division held that patent drawings alone were insufficient and that the applicant had not shown all visible characteristics, especially colours and wall shape, were exclusively technically dictated.
  • The invalidity claim under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 8(1) was therefore rejected, with costs awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000122874

vs Great Wall Motor Company Limited

2026-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000129537

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000129519

vs AST - Advanced Sailing Technologies GmbH

2026-05-11Art 25(1)(b)127
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000124339

vs Radosław Pryba

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000126216

vs Yiwu Guanze Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-10-21Art 25(1)(b)127
000120438

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127
000120399

vs CYBEX GmbH

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)127