DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003562982-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-29

000108841

Contested design: 003562982-0004

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003562982-0004 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Weindich s.j.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Adamieckiego 8, 41503 Chorzów, Poland

Represented by

Arkadiusz Michalak

Holder · RCD owner

Grzegorz Wojdak

Poland (PL)

Izabelińska 23a, 05-126 Aleksandrów, Poland

Prior art cited (8)

Web disclosureD1

photo of a sausage

Instagram post of Anna Mucha · Instagram · disclosed 2015-06-06

Web disclosureD2

beer sausages from barbeque recipe image

https://kuchnialidla.pl/ · kuchnialidla.pl / Google search results · disclosed 2013-06-10

Web disclosureD3

sausage on grill in aromatic marinade

https://e-przepisykulinarne.pl/2015/05/kielbasa-na-grilla-w-prostej-aromatycznej-marynacie/ · e-przepisykulinarne.pl · disclosed 2015-08-15

Web disclosureD4

archived webpage image of sausage

www.pychotka.pl · pychotka.pl / web archive · disclosed 2015-08-05

Web disclosureD5

sausage with onion image

https://gotujmy.pl/kielbasa-na-goraco-z-cebula · gotujmy.pl · disclosed 2011-09-06

PublicationD6

cookbook extract showing a sausage design

cookbook presented on the internet

Web disclosureD7

internet publication showing a sausage design

internet publication · disclosed 2014-05-16

PublicationD8

2013 cookbook showing a sausage design

cookbook

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant alleged lack of novelty and individual character over earlier sausage designs disclosed online and in cookbook-related materials before 1 January 2017.
  • Holder argued the cited images showed cooked products with altered features, incomplete views, and unreliable disclosure dates.
  • The Division accepted disclosure for D1-D8 but rejected additional unnamed web items and the YouTube reference as insufficiently proven under Article 7 CDR.
  • It found the cited sausages differed in size, curvature, and cuts or grill marks, so the contested RCD remained novel over D1-D2 and had individual character over D3-D8.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017
000126096

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)017