DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006576161-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-05

000108621

Contested design: 006576161-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006576161-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Snoresvia PDF extraction

LV

‘Barži’, Tīnūžu pg., Ikšķiles nov., 5015, Latvia

Holder · RCD owner

WGL

LV

A.Dombrovska 45-7, Rīga, 1015, Latvia

Represented by

Inese Kārkle-Jurķe

Prior art cited (1)

International design

appliance for training the sense of balance

DM/100 260 · WIPO Hague Express Database · disclosed 2018-03-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7Article 4(2)Article 3(c)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier international design DM/100 260.
  • Holder contested invalidity, pointed to design differences, argued on informed user and designer freedom, and claimed the product was a complex product.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Hague registration and found Article 4(2) component-part restrictions inapplicable to this application.
  • It held the shared overall structure and appearance outweighed minor hinge and connector differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218