DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003850601-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-05

000109062

Contested design: 003850601-0006

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested registered Community design is declared invalid; the holder must pay the applicant's costs of EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. se estima la solicitud de nulidad. 2. se-declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 003850601. 3. la titular sufrague las costas de la solicitante, cuantificadas en 350 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SC Gold Glass SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str.Lt.Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, et.2, Ap.10, sector 3, 031203 Bucarest, Rumanía

Holder · RCD owner

Semir Examen Marokivia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

str.Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc.C, jabones.82, Bucuresti, Rumanía

Represented by

Claudia Monica Frisch

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Tulip glass plate / soup plate 8

Star Glass Company catalog, declaration, invoices and delivery notes · disclosed 2016-03-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier tulip-pattern glass plate disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed the solidity of the disclosure evidence and argued the earlier design could not reasonably have become known to the relevant circles in the EU.
  • The Division found the catalog, sworn declaration, invoices and delivery notes mutually corroborated prior disclosure under Article 7.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the small decorative differences did not change the overall impression; the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė Sakalaitė
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078