DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 003850601-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-05

000109062

Contested design: 003850601-0006

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested registered Community design is declared invalid; the holder must pay the applicant's costs of EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. se estima la solicitud de nulidad. 2. se-declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 003850601. 3. la titular sufrague las costas de la solicitante, cuantificadas en 350 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SC Gold Glass SRL

Romania (RO)

Str.Lt.Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, et.2, Ap.10, sector 3, 031203 Bucarest, Rumanía

Holder · RCD owner

Semir Examen Maroki

Romania (RO)

str.Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc.C, jabones.82, Bucuresti, Rumanía

Represented by

Claudia Monica Frisch

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Tulip glass plate / soup plate 8

Star Glass Company catalog, declaration, invoices and delivery notes · disclosed 2016-03-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier tulip-pattern glass plate disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed the solidity of the disclosure evidence and argued the earlier design could not reasonably have become known to the relevant circles in the EU.
  • The Division found the catalog, sworn declaration, invoices and delivery notes mutually corroborated prior disclosure under Article 7.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the small decorative differences did not change the overall impression; the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė Sakalaitė
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130021

vs ΛΑΡΙΠΛΑΣΤ ΑΕΒΕ

2026-06-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131250

vs FUTING LIU

2026-06-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078