DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002513580-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-19

000111482

Contested design: 002513580-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0025135800001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Grainea Europevia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Brzozowa 12, 61429 Poznań, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Elżbieta Piątkowska

Elżbieta Piątkowska

Holder · RCD owner

Scholtus Special Products B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

De Hooge Hoek 44, 3927 GG Renswoude, Netherlands

Represented by

Merk Echt B.V.

Prior art cited (2)

Prior useD1

Applicant's 'Dental stick' dog chew sold under the 'GRAINEA' brand

Web disclosureD2

Dog chews marketed under the 'HAU HAU' trade mark

herttakoiruus.blogspot.com; mustijatessa.blogspot.com · weblogs · disclosed 2011-10-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested dog chew design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier designs D1 and D2, and stressed broad designer freedom in this sector.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity claims undefended.
  • The Division accepted D2 as publicly disclosed before the filing date and found dog chews allow substantial design freedom subject only to safe chewability and edibility.
  • It held that the contested design and D2 create the same overall impression despite minor surface differences, so the RCD lacks individual character and must be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126096

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018