DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006352332-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-20

000108310

Contested design: 006352332-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0063523320002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wobben Properties GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Dreekamp 5, 26605 Aurich, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Tom Andresenvia PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Volta da Romanzeira Edificio Villa Nature, apt. 03C, 8125-407 Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal

Prior art cited (3)

PatentD1

tubular tower and construction procedure

WO 2010/055535 A1 · WIPO · disclosed 2010-05-20

PatentAnnex 2

Flanschsegment fur ein Windenergieanlagen-Stahlturmringsegment und Verfahren

DE 10 2017 106 201 A1 · Germany · disclosed 2018-09-27

Web disclosureAnnex 3

screenshots from Flickr and YouTube showing wind turbine tower segment photos and a video still

Flickr and YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and also invoked exclusion grounds concerning non-visible component parts, technical function, and interconnections.
  • The holder disputed disclosure of the earlier designs and argued the contested design was new, had individual character, and was not dictated by technical function.
  • The Division accepted publication of D1 through WIPO as a valid disclosure and treated the informed user as familiar with modular wind turbine tower segments.
  • It found the shared overall shape outweighed differences in holes and number of bends, so the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • The application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit CESSY FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124779

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258