DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006382727-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-01

000107539

Contested design: 006382727-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No 006382727-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité est accueillie. 2. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 006382727-0001 est déclaré nul. 3. La titulaire supporte les frais exposés par la demanderesse, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Imex Licensing Group, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

c. Santa Caterina, 30, 08700 Igualada, Espagne

Holder · RCD owner

Funko, LLC

United States (US)

2802 Wetmore Avenue Everett Washington 2802, Etats-Unis

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

"Gary Cahill" footballer figurine

https://the18.com/soccer-news/football-funko-pop-figures-english-premier-league · the18.com / Internet Archive / Facebook / Twitter / YouTube · disclosed 2018-01-11

Web disclosureD2

footballer figurine

https://www.funko.com/blog/article/coming-soon-pop-football · funko.com · disclosed 2018-01-10

Web disclosureD3

footballer figurine

https://www.funko.com/blog/article/coming-soon-pop-football · funko.com · disclosed 2018-01-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier online disclosures of footballer figurines, especially D1 "Gary Cahill".
  • The holder argued the web evidence was unreliable or insufficient, and that the figurines differed in facial features, stance, and overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the internet and Internet Archive material as adequate proof that D1 had been disclosed before the filing date.
  • It found the contested design produced no different overall impression from D1 on the informed user, so the RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218