DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005817632-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-04

000111681

Contested design: 005817632-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0058176320001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ShaoQuan Luvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 130, Lucun Tun, Dongliang Village, Rongshui Town, Rongshui Miao Autonomous County, Guang Xi 545300, People's Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Shenzhouxing Outdoor Goods Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm. 605 6th Flr. C Build., Demingfa Industrial Zone, No. 26 Jiuwei 1st Rd., Xixiang Str., Bao'an Dist., Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Resistance band set workout band

www.amazon.cn / ASIN B07 5WX 2W9N · Amazon.cn · disclosed 2018-05-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier resistance-band design disclosed online, including on Twitter and Amazon.
  • Applicant relied in particular on an Amazon.cn extract for 'Resistance band set workout band' with ASIN B07 5WX 2W9N, shown as available from 28/05/2018 with pre-filing customer reviews.
  • Holder filed no observations; the Division accepted the Amazon evidence as a prior public disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • Given broad design freedom and the same flat, thin, continuous, plain-band appearance, the contested RCD created no different overall impression and lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit CESSY FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218