DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007449780-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-22

000112121

Contested design: 007449780-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0074497800002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yueli Zhu, Lihao electronicsvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Dongxia village, Tongpu Town, Ruian, Zhejiang 325216, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Jiuchu E-business Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

808, Wenxin Road 68, Xinmu Village, Pinghu Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Nan Li

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

flashlight published by Lottoy-UK on Amazon

Amazon website · disclosed 2017-12-04

Web disclosureD2

YAMI Cat Chaser Toys Interactive Chase Cat Dog Toys 7 in 1 Multi-Pattern Funny Cat Toys LED Flashlight with USB Chargeable

ASIN B07L49TXV7 · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2018-12-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over two earlier flashlight or pet-toy flashlight designs disclosed on Amazon.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and did not rebut the evidence of disclosure.
  • The Division examined D2 first, accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient disclosure before the filing date, and assessed the informed user, design freedom, and overall impression.
  • It found the contested design shared the same overall shape, proportions, and most salient features with D2, while the differences were minor and did not alter the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268