DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007959689-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-01-29

000113001

Contested design: 007959689-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 007959689-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lego Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Shantou Weilifang Infants and Children Products Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 601, 6th Floor, Jinlina Hotel Management Limited, South Side of Yuting Road, Chenghai District, Shantou City, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

figurines [toys]

RCD No 002006437-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2012-03-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy robot design matched the holder's earlier RCD from 2012 and therefore lacked novelty and individual character.
  • It also relied on the LEGO Minifigure design history, while submitting eSearch extracts of the earlier RCD published in the Community Designs Bulletin as evidence.
  • The holder filed no observations, and the Division accepted the earlier RCD's bulletin publication as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found only minor colour and slimness differences, insufficient to alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218