DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003846518-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-02-18

000111121

Contested design: 003846518-0005

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0038465180005 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lafat komerc d.o.o.via PDF extraction

BA

Industrijska zona bb, 57260 Kalesija, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Holder · RCD owner

SC Biodome Europe srlvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Florilor 4, sc. A, ap 20, Sighisoara, Judetul Mures, Sighisoara, Romania

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 4(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design was an internal component of pellet boilers and remained invisible during normal use, so it failed Article 4(2) CDR.
  • The holder replied that the component was visible in use, especially through the glass door of certain fireplace models, and that cleaning-related access supported user familiarity with it.
  • The Division held that cleaning was preparatory maintenance rather than normal use, but found the component partly visible during operation through the glass window of marketed products.
  • Because visibility during normal use was proven for at least some commercialised complex products, the Article 25(1)(b) challenge failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125335

vs Digikor Oy

2025-02-11Art 25(1)(b)237
000121854

vs Zhenhua Sun

2024-02-26Art 25(1)(b)237
000120318

vs BIODOM EUROPE S.R.L.

2023-10-10Art 25(1)(b)237
000120199

vs William Huang

2023-05-30Art 25(1)(b)237
000116628

vs DCX POLSKA Sp. z o.o.

2023-01-13Art 25(1)(b)237
000118242

vs TAIZHOU WEIYE REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT CO.,LTD

2022-11-03Art 25(1)(b)237
000114601

vs fire friends GmbH & Co. KG

2022-03-23Art 25(1)(b)237
000114903

vs CERAMICA CIELO S.p.A.

2022-03-18Art 25(1)(b)237