DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006371787-0028

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-12

000112890

Contested design: 006371787-0028

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006371787-0028 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

MAR 2000 OOD

Bulgaria (BG)

JK 'Nadejda', 5, Stefanson str., 1220 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Bureau Ignatov & Son

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Packaging scene for the 'Spider-Man's Spider Crawler' interlocking toy bricks set

Toy set No 76114 · brickipedia.fandom.com and retail websites · disclosed 2018-11-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design reproduced the arrangement of design elements shown on the packaging of its Spider-Man's Spider Crawler toy set No 76114, differing only by removal of the background.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not respond to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the applicant had sufficiently proved pre-filing public disclosure of the packaging scene through retail websites, internet advertising, and online reviews before 8 April 2019.
  • Comparing the disclosures, the Division found the contested design identical to the earlier design except for immaterial tiny flying objects, so the RCD lacked novelty.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 5(1)(b) CDR, and the Division did not examine the individual-character ground further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218