DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007337191-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-16

000113103

Contested design: 007337191-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0073371910001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

101, No 31, Lane 3, Xiasha Village, Shatou Street, Futian District, Shenzhen City, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Greg Sach

Holder · RCD owner

Jian Yu

China (CN)

No. 1 Linghai Road, Ganjingzi District, 116026 Dalian City, Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Manuel De Arpe Tejero

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Bear-shaped wooden puzzle from the Amazon listing “Wooden Puzzles for 1 2 3 Year Olds, 6 Pack Wooden Jigsaw Set for Toddlers, Animal Puzzle Educational Toys for 1 2 Year Old Boy Girls”

ASIN B07VN3HY83 · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2019-07-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier bear-shaped wooden puzzle disclosed on Amazon.co.uk before the RCD filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Amazon screenshots, ASIN information, and pre-filing customer comments and images; the holder filed no observations or rebuttal evidence.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon evidence as a valid prior disclosure under Article 7 and treated the bear puzzle as the relevant earlier design.
  • Given the designer’s broad freedom and the designs’ identical shape, decoration, colours, and proportions, the contested RCD created the same overall impression and lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218