DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006880027-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-19

000113662

Contested design: 006880027-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0068800270002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jers Portugal, Ldavia PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Travessa Dr. Francisco Machado Owen, 55, 4715022 Braga Portugal

Represented by

José Luis Sousa Menezes

Holder · RCD owner

José Joaquim Durães

Portugal (PT)

Rua do Seixo, n.º 229, 4860 064 Arco de Baúlhe, Portugal

Represented by

Abel Dário Pinto de Oliveira

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

electronic candle 'GE-300F'

https://www.facebook.com/lumandlelimited/post/ · Facebook profile of the Chinese manufacturer, corroborated by invoices · disclosed 2016-05-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7Article 5(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior disclosure of the GE-300F electronic candle before the RCD filing date.
  • The applicant filed Facebook material, emails, a price list, and Portuguese invoices to show public disclosure and trade use of the earlier candle design.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's evidence.
  • The Division found the Facebook posts and invoices sufficiently proved disclosure under Article 7 and held the compared designs identical apart from an immaterial bulb-tip detail.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of novelty, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268