DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006880027-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-19

000114003

Contested design: 006880027-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0068800270007 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jers Portugal, Ldavia PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Travessa Dr. Francisco Machado Owen, 55, 4715022 Braga Portugal

Represented by

José Luis Sousa Menezes

Holder · RCD owner

José Joaquim Durães

Portugal (PT)

Rua do Seixo, n.º 229, 4860 064 Arco de Baúlhe, Portugal

Represented by

Abel Dário Pinto de Oliveira

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Electric candle GE-600 shown in Facebook posts from the applicant's Chinese manufacturer and supported by invoices.

Facebook account of the applicant's Chinese manufacturer · disclosed 2018-09-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior disclosure and sales of electric candle GE-600 before the RCD filing date.
  • The applicant submitted Facebook posts, email correspondence, and invoices to show prior public disclosure and sales, including sales to the holder.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the Division accepted the applicant's unrebutted facts and evidence regarding disclosure.
  • The Division found the prior design identical to the contested RCD, held the RCD lacked novelty under Article 5 CDR, and declared it invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268