DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001453666-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-08

000110671

Contested design: 001453666-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 001453666-0007. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jaime Daniel Steelsvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Junta de los Caminos, 47, 29190 Málaga, España

Represented by

Alicia Álvarez Gorris

Holder · RCD owner

Naxani Design, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Avda. de la Libertad, 38, 46600 Alzira (Valencia), España

Represented by

Sandra Santos Rodríguez

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

PRENN bathroom furniture design shown in Naxani catalogs and February 2015 public price list

PRENN · Naxani public price list and product catalogs · disclosed 2015-02-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested bathroom furniture design lacked novelty and individual character because the holder had already disclosed the PRENN design in catalogs, trade fairs, and a February 2015 price list.
  • The holder disputed the evidential value and dating of the catalogs and price list, and argued the compared designs were not identical and created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the late-filed February 2015 price list as complementary evidence linked to the earlier catalogs and found the PRENN design had been publicly disclosed before the grace period.
  • Comparing the disclosures, the Division found only immaterial differences, held the designs identical for novelty purposes, and concluded the contested RCD lacked novelty under Article 5.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0406.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068