DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007807631-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-08

000112601

Contested design: 007807631-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0078076310001 is rejected.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SC Depozitul de Tabla International S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Bulevardul Galati, nr. 25, bloc R6, scara 1, etaj parter, ap. 2, Galati, jud. Galati, Romania

Holder · RCD owner

Bilka Steel SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

17 Henri Coanda Street, City of Brasov, Brasov County, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

metal panel for fences

Community design registration No 0053167910001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-06-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 25(1)(d)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested fence-panel design lacked novelty and individual character and conflicted with earlier RCD No 0053167910001.
  • The holder responded that the panel top, number and shape of grooves and protrusions, and overall outline differed materially from the earlier design.
  • The Division held Article 25(1)(d) CDR did not apply because the earlier design had been published before the contested filing date, then compared overall impressions under Articles 6 and 5 CDR.
  • It found visible differences in the top shape, the number and pattern of protrusions and grooves, and the straight versus curved outline, so the contested RCD had individual character and novelty.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106301

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)259
000106280

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)259
000106299

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)259
000106300

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)259
000106281

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)259
000128596

vs Griptel AB

2025-07-17Art 25(1)(b)257
000124436

vs Ziel Home Furnishing Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-11-19Art 25(1)(b)257
000121099

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257