DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007484316-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-08

000113982

Contested design: 007484316-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0074843160001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LAH Schmitt GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Großsachsenerstraße 2a, 69493 Hirschberg, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Lingling Wuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 55, Cuowei, Tianbian Village, Daitou Town, Xiuyu District, Putian City, Fujian Province 351100, People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Dartboard Surround 4 Piece Black dartboard catch ring

ASIN B00DUDX84Y · amazon.de · disclosed 2013-07-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier dart catch rings disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The applicant submitted Amazon printouts, especially D1 with ASIN B00DUDX84Y first available on 8 July 2013; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted D1 as prior disclosure, found the informed user could directly compare the products, and held the designer had enough freedom beyond the ring's inner perimeter.
  • Because the contested design reproduced D1's overall impression with only immaterial differences, the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218