DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001809138-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-19

000111081

Contested design: 001809138-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0018091380001 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Flamagas S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Metalúrgia 38-42, 08038 Barcellona, Spagna

Represented by

Herrero & Asociados

Holder · RCD owner

MatMind S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Via degli Olmetti 46, 00060 Formello, Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

three-dimensional 'CLIPPER' lighter mark

EUTM No 004758652 · EU Trade Marks Bulletin · disclosed 2006-12-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character based on the earlier three-dimensional EU trade mark 'CLIPPER' disclosed before the contested RCD's filing date.
  • The holder argued the challenge was unfounded and that the compared lighters shared only a rounded shape while differing in their other visible design features.
  • The Division accepted the earlier mark's publication as a valid disclosure and assessed individual character from the informed user's perspective with broad design freedom for lighters.
  • It found the contested design created a different overall impression because of multiple structural and visual differences, so the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

27.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010747

vs nextro GmbH

2018-12-19Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)277
000010628

vs nextro GmbH

2018-11-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)277
000010795

vs posh global GmbH

2018-10-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)277
000130847

vs Ying CAO

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)275
000125137

vs Shenzhen Olit Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)275
000127919

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2025-05-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)275
000124395

vs Xin Lu

2025-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)275
000126756

vs SHENZHEN KAIWEILI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2024-12-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)275