DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006989315-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-19

000111402

Contested design: 006989315-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design No 006989315-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 006989315-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amazon EU S.à r.l.via PDF extraction

LU

38 avenue John F. Kennedy, 1855 Luxembourg, Luxemburg

Represented by

Hogan Lovells

Holder · RCD owner

Anji Funuo Furniture Co. Ltd

China (CN)

Building 2, Chengnan Community, Lingfeng Subdistrict Anji County, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province 313300, Volksrepublik China

Prior art cited (6)

Web disclosureD1

AeroCool act120rgb gaming chair

ASIN B077FXRZQX; https://www.amazon.de/AeroCool-Beleuchtung-Fernbedienung-gepolsterte-Lendenkissen/dp/B077FXRZQX/ref=sr_1_1?__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%B · amazon.de · disclosed 2017-11-14

Prior use

ThunderX3 RCDHEX gaming chair

disclosed 2018-03-20

Prior use

AIM professioneller Gaming-Stuhl

disclosed 2018-07-14

Prior use

AeroCool AC220 AIR RGB-B Gaming Chair Blakc Multi Plattform

disclosed 2018-12-21

Prior use

GAME Racing ELITE RGB GT400

disclosed 2019-10-07

Prior use

GEAR4U Iluminated med RGB

disclosed 2019-09-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier disclosed gaming-chair designs, especially D1 sold via amazon.de before filing.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed before the filing date and found only limited functional constraints, leaving broad design freedom for gaming chairs.
  • Because the contested design created nearly the same overall impression as D1, it lacked individual character and was declared invalid; the remaining prior designs were not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068