DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007367073-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-20

000111421

Contested design: 007367073-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Community design No. 007367073-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 007367073-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amazon EU S.à r.l.via PDF extraction

LU

38 avenue John F. Kennedy, 1855 Luxembourg, Luxemburg

Represented by

Hogan Lovells

Holder · RCD owner

Anji Funuo Furniture Co. Ltd

China (CN)

Building 2, Chengnan Community, Lingfeng Subdistrict Anji County, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province 313300, Volksrepublik China

Prior art cited (11)

Web disclosureD1

DON ONE Valentino gaming chair with LED lighting

https://www.coolshop.de/produkt/don-one-valentino-led-gaming-stuhl-schwarz/AK2G7M/a; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfnd2akY7xc · coolshop.de / YouTube · disclosed 2019-10-23

Prior use

GEAR4U Iluminated med RGB gaming chair

disclosed 2019-09-12

Prior use

Game Racing ELITE RGB GT400 gaming chair

disclosed 2019-10-07

Prior use

DELTACO GAMING RGB Gaming Chair GAM-080

disclosed 2019-11-12

Prior use

AeroCool act120rgb gaming chair

disclosed 2018-01-27

Prior use

AeroCool AC220 AIR RGB-B Gaming Chair Black Multi-Plattform

disclosed 2018-12-21

Prior use

Keep Out SXPRO RGB Gaming Chair

disclosed 2019-12-02

Prior use

Dragon War GC-015 RGB Gaming Chair

disclosed 2019-10-23

Prior use

RAIDMAX DK925 ARGB gaming chair

disclosed 2019-11-06

Prior use

ThunderX3 RCDHEX gaming chair

disclosed 2018-03-20

Prior use

AIM professioneller Gaming-Stuhl

disclosed 2018-07-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier gaming-chair lighting disclosures available before 10 December 2019.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, novelty, or individual character.
  • The Division accepted D1's YouTube and webshop disclosure under Article 7 and found the informed user would receive an almost identical overall impression from the compared lighting-strip designs.
  • The application was upheld in full; the contested design was declared invalid and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268