DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007367073-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-20

000111441

Contested design: 007367073-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 007367073-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amazon EU S.à r.l.via PDF extraction

LU

38 avenue John F. Kennedy, 1855 Luxembourg, Luxemburg

Represented by

Hogan Lovells

Holder · RCD owner

Anji Funuo Furniture Co. Ltd

China (CN)

Building 2, Chengnan Community, Lingfeng Subdistrict Anji County, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province 313300, Volksrepublik China

Prior art cited (11)

Web disclosureD1

Keep Out XSPRO RGB gaming chair

ASIN B082J1TNCC · Amazon.de · disclosed 2019-12-09

Web disclosure

DELTACO GAMING RGB Gaming Chair GAM-080

disclosed 2019-11-12

Web disclosure

DON ONE Valentino

disclosed 2019-10-23

Web disclosure

GEAR4U Iluminated med RGB

disclosed 2019-09-12

Web disclosure

Dragon War GC-015 RGB Gaming Chair

disclosed 2019-10-23

Web disclosure

ThunderX3 RC3HEX

disclosed 2018-03-20

Web disclosure

GAME Racing ELITE RGB GT400

disclosed 2019-10-07

Web disclosure

AeroCool act120rgb

disclosed 2018-01-27

Web disclosure

AeroCool AC220 AIR RGB-B Gaming Chair Black Multi-Plattform

disclosed 2018-12-21

Web disclosure

RAIDMAX DK925 ARGB gaming chair

disclosed 2019-11-06

Web disclosure

AIM professioneller Gaming-Stuhl

disclosed 2018-07-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier online disclosures of RGB gaming-chair light strips before the contested RCD's filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted Amazon.de evidence for D1 as prior disclosure under Article 7 and found the informed user would receive an almost identical overall impression from D1 and the contested design.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6, so the application was upheld, the RCD declared invalid, and costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268