DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007367073-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-23

000111422

Contested design: 007367073-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 007367073-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amazon EU S.à r.l.via PDF extraction

LU

38 avenue John F. Kennedy, 1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Represented by

Hogan Lovells

Holder · RCD owner

Anji Funuo Furniture Co. Ltd

China (CN)

Building 2, Chengnan Community, Lingfeng Subdistrict Anji County, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province 313300, Volksrepublik China

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

GEAR4U Iluminated med RGB gaming chair with illuminated strip

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8L3YNpP0-AU · YouTube · disclosed 2019-09-12

Prior use

Keep Out XSPRO RGB gaming chair with light sources

German and European market · disclosed 2019-12-02

Prior use

Game Racing ELITE RGB GT400 gaming chair with light sources

German and European market · disclosed 2019-10-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier gaming-chair light-strip disclosures including the GEAR4U Iluminated med RGB product and other RGB gaming chairs sold before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted D1's YouTube product review as a public disclosure under Article 7, found the informed user could directly compare the light strips, and considered designer freedom broad despite the product's placement constraints.
  • It held the contested light strip created essentially the same overall impression as D1, so the design lacked individual character and had to be declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268